![]() |
||
So, isn't that a little bit sexist? Well, yes and no. It's a matter of what I find attractive. Do I find decidedly masculine guys, who are in no way androgynous, attractive? Sure, sometimes. Am I attracted to guys without long hair? Often. Am I attracted to guys who's features are in no way ambiguous? Yes... But that's just the thing: I'm gay. I'm attracted to guys... and when that proverbial line of androgyny is pushed too far toward the feminine side, the attraction fades. Considering some of my sexual partners in the past, this may surprise some. I've dated transgendered persons, and drag queens. I've clearly crossed the etherial line I've just established in the paragraph above -- and that is because personality and individualism can supercede the physical for me. The transgendered partner was someone I loved; they were kind, compassionate, educated, and open minded. I loved them, and learned so much from them. The drag queen was a different matter, he was sweet and kind, and was hot outside of drag... I have a number of transgendered friends (both MTF anf FTM), as well as a number of friends who are into cross dressing, both for fetishism and for personal reasons. I get along with them well, and consider myself to be a friend and ally... But, none of this is the point I am trying to make... |
![]() |
|
When a man (or male) leans towards the feminine side of appearance, they are shunned. They are considered weak, broken, and disturbed. Men can not wear skirts or dresses without being perceived as homosexual, as psychologically damaged and without being shunned by society at large. When men take traditionally feminine careers, such as nurses and interior designers, they are almost always the subject of humiliating jokes, and perceived as homosexual. The whole of society shuns them; even a majority of the LGBT community seems to be uncomfortable with males who either crossdress, or are transgendered. A woman in pants is a beacon; a man in a dress is (at best) the butt of a joke. Why is that? Well, the best conclusion I can make is that there is an inherent flaw in our culture that men are superior to women. The characteristics of being masculine are considered positives: strength, power, bravery, intellect... But, women have desirable traits too. The problem is that our society perceives feminine traits as those such as 'weakness, frailty, soft, gentle', when in fact, women have many desirable traits, which can vary depending on your perspective of women and the role they have played in your life... I imagine that many guys who cross the proverbial line into femininity are seeking to gain traits such as 'sexy, seductive, powerful, elegant.'; and there is nothing wrong with wanting to be any of those things. Yet, while the fade from female to masculinity can be blurred without consequence, the line from male to femininity can not. In many countries, it is considered a crime. In many places in the world, walking on the street as a guy in womens' clothing is an immediate death sentence, by the hands of unskilled, self-made executioners with blunt objects. In other places, you are more likely to get taunted, laughed at, and harassed... While a woman in pants is very widely accepted, a man in a dress is still a stigma, or a cheap joke in a situation comedy show. If you think about it, it doesn't make sense. If females can be masculine (F=M) than shouldn't males be able to be feminine? (M=F) Mathematically, the principle is sound, but in society it is not. I think that's wrong. They are just clothes. It's just makeup. The simple fact is, it shouldn't matter- and in reality, it doesn't- but we still think it matters, and so the stigmas are perpetuated. We are slow to let go of the things we think we know.
|
||
| click here for reposting requirements and copyright information | |||
design by:.gfg llc • box 11721 • syracuse, ny 13218-1721 usa Friend me on FaceBook® |